in News Departments > New & Noteworthy
print the content item

The Idaho Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has reviewed more than $42 million in expenses incurred by Idaho Power Co. to promote energy efficiency and reduce demand. The commission determined that the vast majority of those expenses were prudently incurred.

That determination does not impact customer rates, but signals the commission's approval for the expenses incurred to operate 20 demand-side management (DSM) programs funded by a 4% rider on customer bills. The PUC says 17 of the programs offer customers financial incentives to use their energy more efficiently, while three of the programs reduce demand on the company's system by shifting energy use to off-peak times of the day.

The programs must pass multiple cost-efficiency tests that demonstrate that DSM savings are greater than the programs' costs. One of the tests must reflect a savings to all customers, not just to those who directly participate in the energy efficiency programs. The PUC adds that reduced energy demand and energy used more efficiently lessens the need for Idaho Power to have to generate the power itself or acquire it from more costly resources, and it offsets the need for the utility to build new resources. The commission says its prudency review helps establish that, without these programs in place, customer bills would be even higher.

During 2011, Idaho Power achieved 179,424 MWh of energy savings, or enough energy to service more than 12,900 average homes for a year, according to the PUC. Some of the efficiency programs include financial incentives for customers to invest in efficient lighting, in Energy Star products and heating and cooling efficiencies. The three demand-reduction programs, such as air conditioner cycling and irrigation load control, provide customers incentives to shift their energy consumption to hours of the day when demand on Idaho Power’s generation system is not as great. Those programs reduced  demand by 403 MW, a 20% increase over 2010 levels.

The commission did not include about $89,600 in expense related to labor expense increases for Idaho Power employees whose salaries are funded by the energy efficiency rider. The commission did not say those expenses are not justifiable, but that they did not receive the same scrutiny that employee wages and benefits in other sectors of the company receive during a general rate case. Idaho Power was given more time to provide more information to determine whether the increase in the labor-related expense is reasonable when compared to the benefits those expenses achieve.

Also not included was $82,855 in expense related to Idaho Power’s air conditioner cycling program. Equipment and software needed to operate the program was not functioning properly and should have been more carefully monitored, the commission says.

The commission denied about $212,340 in carrying charges from interest accrued on incentive payments made to customers with custom-made efficiency programs. The amount of carrying charge allowed is an issue that should be determined in a general rate case, the commission adds. 

The commission also directed Idaho Power to expand participation from members of the company’s Energy Efficiency Advisory Group (EEAG), a 12-member committee representing customer groups and other interested parties that advises the company on its energy efficiency programs. The commission says the company should encourage questions and feedback from all attending stakeholders, not just EEAG members.

DSM programs and measures are powerful tools that help customers manage their energy consumption and mitigate the impact of potential rate increases, the commission notes. In recognition of this, the PUC says it has directed Idaho Power to expand participation in the EEAG. The commission adds the company should increase customer awareness of energy efficiency programs and improve “customers’ energy I.Q.”

Hse SandyHook
Latest Top Stories

NERC CIP Version 5: Security In The Age Of Cyber Warfare

An expert from Waterfall Security Solutions finds that the latest standards are a leap forward for cybersecurity.

Does Income Determine Who Benefits The Most From Smart Grids?

According to the Smart Grid Consumer Collaborative, low-income consumers may be at a disadvantage.

Accenture And Siemens Form Smart Grid Joint Venture

OMNETRIC Group will help utilities improve energy efficiency, grid operations and reliability.

Maine Public Utilities Commission: Smart Meters Are Safe

According to a report by the commission, there is no direct link between smart meters and health issues.

Report: Global Solar Deployment Topped Wind In 2013

Research firm Clean Edge finds that solar surpassed wind for the first time since it began tracking international markets in 2000.

S&C Electric_id176